Pacific Rim: Uprising (2018)

I rewatched Pacific Rim (please don't go read the pathetic review I wrote years ago) about a month ago and two things I realised. First, it was not as good as I remembered, and second, it did not need a sequel. But we all know how Hollywood works, so Pacific Rim: Uprising happened. 

Ten years after the Battle of the Breach, in which humanity defeated the Kaiju monsters by sealing the entrance into our world. Jake Pentecost (John Boyega), the son of Stacker (sadly Idris Elba does not appear in this), makes a living by stealing Jaeger parts. While on a job, he meets Amara (Cailee Spaeny), an orphan teenage girl, who gets both arrested by the Pan-Pacific Defense Corps, and Jake is tasked, with the help of his former co-pilot, Nate Lambert (Scott Eastwood),  to train a new crop of Jaeger cadets in case the Kaiju return.

And guess what? They do return and the whole movie is about them. It is so much about them that the writers didn't even bother developing the plot. Because who needs not a solid, but at least decent plot when you can have big robots fighting big monsters on the big screen? Okay, I'm not being fair, they did try to do something, like too many subplots --the rivalry between Jake and Nate, Jaeger drones making human pilots obsolete, the rivalry between Amara and another young cadet-- that do absolutely nothing for the film. There's a twist but I saw it coming miles ahead. 

Another issue with Pacific Rim: Uprising is its characters. Every single one of them is one-dimensional. They have no depth, but what's worse is that they are uninteresting and unlikable. How do you even care for characters like these? You can't, that's how. Not to mention that some of these characters --Jake-- came out of nowhere. 

Universal Pictures
With such a poor script, there's absolutely nothing the cast can do. John Boyega is very charismatic and charming, probably even more than Charlie Hunnam, and yet he does not manage to make his character likeable. All the forced jokes he has to deliver are a part of the problem. Scott Eastwood is nothing more than a pretty face who lacks the talent of his father. Cailee Spaeny isn't terrible but her chemistry with Boyega --he's basically Finn, she's basically Rey-- is non-existent. Rinko Kikuchi, Charlie Day and Burn Gorman reprise their role but they all are quite weak. The teen actors (considering how Hollywood works, they probably are 30 years old or something) are unwatchable.

The action too is a mess. Pacific Rim: Uprising being about monsters fighting robots, there's very little action in this. Also, the sequences aren't exciting and very forgettable. As for the special effects, they are good but nothing above average with today's standards. 

8 comments :

  1. Yup. I watched this weeks ago and promptly forgot almost everything about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Same here. My cousin asked me what the movie was about and all I told him was a basic plot (humans fight huge monsters with huge robots) and that the first one is way better lol

      Delete
  2. This sequel was cancelled and picked up again too many times for me to count! I shamelessly loved the first one when it came out - so I'm kind of scared to rewatch it in case I realise it wasn't actually that good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I rewatched the first about a month before watching this and it really let me down. But at least it has del Toro's visuals!

      Delete
  3. Yikes! I haven't seen the first because of lack of interest and this one is right up there.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't have much interest in seeing it. Guillermito isn't exactly involved in this. If has no part in the writing or directing in this, then I will not see it. The reason I enjoyed Pacific Rim was largely because of Guillermito who knew what to do and how to make something so fun to watch and not take it seriously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. del Toro is basically the only reason the first is better than this trash.

      Delete